Early in the Plandemic I wrote a blog called ‘The Iris and the Axe (just add the Vs)’; it’s time now for ‘The Oice’, only this title doesn’t work as well. (That said, it’s only a short distance to ‘oink’, which is not far off the point…)
Piggybank image courtesy ‘Skittlephoto’ (9660) and Pexels
I’ve got to hand it to ‘Them’, they have done their homework in regards to how to influence people. Those in power know how to sway people’s emotions with words and images and ideas that appeal to our best intentions (such as fairness and care of the Earth). And since they also have big $$ budgets to back up their bunkum, we need to make sure our own brains are switched on.
It’s rather wonderful to observe that the ‘ordinary people’ are seeing through the bunkum: early polls are indicating that a No vote is most likely at the upcoming referendum. No doubt the powers-that-be will manipulate whatever happens to serve their own ends, but in case you are still sorting through the mire, here are a few distinctions that might be useful:
• Many individuals are pointing out how divisive this ‘Voice to Parliament’ legislation would be because it focuses on race and pits one population against another.
• Many are asking why so many millions of dollars have been invested in promoting the ‘Yes’ vote and virtually nothing toward the ‘No’. That is clearly a one-sided, political dynamic in itself. (Have you seen the excerpt from the Senate hearing where Qantas execs are being grilled for promoting the ‘Yes’ vote? It’s very satisfying to watch! Next in line – hopefully – other bought multinationals such as Coles, Woolworths, Bunnings, Dan Murphy, etc.. It was so sad to see that John Farnham allowed his magnificent song to be used in this grubby manner that so completely undermines the song’s actual message.)
• The Original people of this land already have lots of representation in other forms, and many millions of funding directed to them. (E.g. There are 11 indigenous members of Parliament, the ‘Advisory Council’, which already is a v oice to Parliament, and more than 30 land councils; something like $40 billion is ‘given’ to the indigenous to ‘close the gap’ – $50K per Aboriginal in Australia, not including Centrelink and Medicare. The problem is that not many of those millions actually reach the ‘ordinary originals’, so can we trust the government to do anything different this time?
• And if it’s true that Aboriginal youth were bribed by the same government to have the shot ($100 per jab) and some had as many nine shots (and died), can we believe that the government really has their best interests at heart?
• And if they aren’t going to be different this time, why are they doing this?
• And since the Original peoples never surrendered their sovereignty to the newcomers all those years ago, is it possible that this Referendum is just a means of getting them under the corporate Constitution of this government and thereby stripping them (and simultaneously the rest of us) of all land/property rights? So I’ve heard… (The only true ‘Australia’ that is owned and controlled by the ‘government’ is Norfolk Island, otherwise known as ‘No-folk Island’ because there were no folk there when the newcomers arrived; since the rest of this land was not ‘terra nullis’ at that time, the whites’ arrival equated to an unlawful foreign occupation.)
• Are we really prepared to surrender all free access to the beaches, rivers, forests of this land? So it seems, when you unpack the fine print. And Parliament would be under control of the Oice, so there would be no protection under any Constitution.
• We only have to notice the many Original leaders speaking out against the proposed changes to ‘the Constitution’ (such as MP Jacinta Price) to know that the government is not telling the whole story, and the indigenous who are promoting it are very likely being paid for putting their names and faces to the Yes position.
• We should also note that some people are choosing not to vote at all since the government is fraudulent, the corporate constitution is fraudulent, the writ and referendum are therefore fraudulent, and participating (by voting) is therefore also engaging in fraud. Do with that what you will!
May your voice in these times be inspired, clear and strong.
And, just to be on the right side of the legal system, “None of this message is to be construed as advice. It is for entertainment purposes only.” 😊
Recent Comments